Analysis 14 of 19Space
What does it cost to reach orbit?
What does it cost per kilogram to reach low Earth orbit, by launch vehicle, and how much has that fallen?
The short answer In NASA's 2018 table, a kilogram to low Earth orbit cost $2.7k on a Falcon 9 and $61.7k on the space shuttle, in 2018 dollars: a factor of about 23. The first launch system, Vanguard in 1957, cost $894.7k. The shuttle figure varies between NASA's own papers, from $54.5k to $75.0k, with the cost and payload used; to the ISS the saving is 4.2 times. The table ends in 2018.
- Public data
- 2018 dollars
- Table ends in 2018
- Prices, not costs, for commercial vehicles
- Source
- NASA Technical Reports Server: H. W. Jones (NASA Ames), ICES-2018-81 and ICES-2017-87
- Period
- Vehicles first flown 1957 to 2018; 2018 dollars
- Licence
- US government work, public use permitted, credit NASA
- Charts
- 3, each with its data table and CSV
Key figures
- $2.7kFalcon 9, per kg to LEO2018 dollars, Table A1, page 8
- $61.7kSpace shuttle, per kg to LEO2018 dollars; $54.5k to $75.0k across NASA's papers
- 23 timesShuttle against Falcon 94.2 times to the ISS
- $894.7kVanguard, 1957The first launch system in the table
- $18.6kAverage, systems first flown 1970 to 200022 systems; the paper's text says $18.5k
The charts
Chart 1Lead chart · cost per kg
Cost per kg to low Earth orbit fell from $894.7k for Vanguard in 1957 to $2.7k for the Falcon 9.
What has it cost to put a kilogram into low Earth orbit?
NASA Ames, H. W. Jones · public data
| System | First launch year | Cost per kg to LEO ($k per kg, 2018 dollars) | Reference the paper cites |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | 1,957 | 894.7 | Koelle, 1991 |
| Delta E | 1,960 | 167.8 | Koelle, 1991 |
| Scout | 1,961 | 111.8 | Koelle, 1991 |
| Titan II | 1,962 | 31.0 | Wertz and Larson, 1996 |
| Atlas-Centaur | 1,964 | 28.0 | Koelle, 1991 |
| Proton SL-13 | 1,965 | 4.1 | Wertz and Larson, 1996 |
| Saturn IB | 1,966 | 17.3 | Koelle, 1991 |
| Soyuz | 1,966 | 7.6 | Futron, 2002 |
| Cosmos | 1,967 | 12.4 | Futron, 2002 |
| Kosmos | 1,967 | 8.0 | Wikipedia, Comparison, 2018 |
| Saturn V | 1,968 | 5.2 | Williams, 2016 |
| Long March 2E | 1,971 | 7.7 | Wertz and Larson, 1996 |
| Long March 2C | 1,974 | 10.0 | Futron, 2002 |
| Titan-Centaur | 1,974 | 11.2 | Koelle, 1991 |
| Delta 3910 | 1,975 | 28.0 | Koelle, 1991 |
| Space shuttle | 1,981 | 61.7 | Pielke and Byerly, 2011 |
| Long March 3B | 1,984 | 6.3 | Futron, 2002 |
| Zenit 2 | 1,985 | 4.4 | Futron, 2002 |
| Ariane 44 | 1,988 | 17.9 | Wertz and Larson, 1996 |
| Delta II | 1,989 | 15.3 | Futron, 2002 |
| Taurus | 1,989 | 20.4 | Wertz and Larson, 1996 |
| Titan IV | 1,989 | 24.7 | Wertz and Larson, 1996 |
| Pegasus XL | 1,990 | 43.5 | Futron, 2002 |
| Atlas IIA | 1,991 | 19.8 | Wertz and Larson, 1996 |
| Start | 1,993 | 16.7 | Futron, 2002 |
| H-2 | 1,994 | 26.4 | Wertz and Larson, 1996 |
| Rockot | 1,994 | 10.4 | Futron, 2002 |
| Athena 1 | 1,995 | 31.7 | Wertz and Larson, 1996 |
| Athena 2 | 1,995 | 16.6 | Futron, 2002 |
| Ariane 5G | 1,996 | 13.1 | Futron, 2002 |
| Delta III | 1,998 | 11.7 | Koelle, 1991 |
| Dnepr | 1,999 | 4.9 | Futron, 2002 |
| Zenit 3SL | 1,999 | 7.6 | Futron, 2002 |
| Falcon 9 | 2,010 | 2.7 | SpaceX.com, 2018 |
| Vega | 2,012 | 10.0 | Wikipedia, Comparison, 2018 |
| Falcon Heavy | 2,018 | 1.4 | SpaceX.com, 2018 |
Chart 2Disagreement between readings
NASA's two papers give the shuttle $54.5k to $75.0k per kg to low Earth orbit.
Do the sources agree?
NASA Ames, H. W. Jones · public data
| Reading | Cost per kg ($k per kg) | Where | Cost, payload and dollar basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shuttle to LEO, abstract of the 2018 paper | 54.50 | Abstract (no table), page 1 | Cost per launch as the paper reports it (about $1.5 billion), no inflation adjustment; payload is the shuttle's 27,500 kg to LEO. |
| Shuttle to LEO, Table A2 of the 2018 paper | 61.72 | Table A2, page 8 | Cost per launch converted to 2018 dollars with the CPI; payload 27,500 kg to LEO. |
| Shuttle to LEO, Table 1 of the 2017 paper | 75.00 | Table 1, page 2 | Cost per launch of $1,200 million (the paper cites Pielke and Byerly, 2011), no dollar year stated; payload 16,000 kg, the shuttle's capacity to the ISS, not its 27,500 kg to LEO. |
| Falcon 9 to LEO, abstract of the 2018 paper | 2.72 | Abstract (no table), page 1 | SpaceX's advertised price of $62 million for 22,800 kg to LEO (a price, as advertised in 2018, not NASA's cost). |
| Falcon 9 to LEO, Table A2 of the 2018 paper | 2.72 | Table A2, page 8 | Same $62 million and 22,800 kg, stated in 2018 dollars. |
| Falcon 9 to LEO, Table 1 of the 2017 paper | 2.72 | Table 1, page 2 | Same $62 million and 22,800 kg. |
| Shuttle to the ISS, abstract of the 2018 paper | 93.40 | Abstract (no table), page 1 | About $1.5 billion as reported, no inflation adjustment; 16,050 kg to the ISS. |
| Shuttle to the ISS, Table 1 of the 2018 paper | 105.80 | Table 1, page 3 | $1,697 million in 2018 dollars; 16,050 kg to the ISS. |
| Falcon 9 plus Dragon to the ISS, abstract of the 2018 paper | 23.30 | Abstract (no table), page 1 | About $140 million as reported, no inflation adjustment; 6,000 kg to the ISS. |
| Falcon 9 plus Dragon to the ISS, Table 1 of the 2018 paper | 25.00 | Table 1, page 3 | $150 million in 2018 dollars; 6,000 kg to the ISS. |
Chart 3Breakdown by destination
To the ISS the saving is a factor of 4.2, not 23.
Is the saving the same for cargo to the space station?
NASA Ames, H. W. Jones · public data
| System | To LEO ($k per kg, 2018 dollars) | To the ISS ($k per kg, 2018 dollars) |
|---|---|---|
| Space shuttle | 61.72 | 105.8 |
| Falcon 9 (with Dragon for the ISS) | 2.72 | 25.0 |
01Findings
What the charts say.
Cost per kg to LEO fell from $894.7k (Vanguard, 1957) to $5.2k (Saturn V, 1968), then held near $18.6k on average for the 22 systems first flown from 1970 to 2000, until the Falcons at $2.7k and $1.4k.
The shuttle's cost per kg to LEO is $54.5k, $61.7k or $75.0k depending on the paper and the cost and payload used, a spread of 1.38 times. The Falcon 9 reads the same in all three tables.
The saving over the shuttle is a factor of 23 to LEO but 4.2 to the ISS, because Dragon adds cost and mass.
02Method
How the figures were built.
Steps
- No API. Downloaded both NTRS PDFs and read them with pdftotext -layout. Table A1 (page 8) was parsed into 36 rows; Table A2 (page 8), Table 1 (page 3) and the abstract (page 1) of paper A and Table 1 (page 2) of paper B were parsed from their text. Each row was checked at its page (the expected text and the printed page number), and each cost per kg was recomputed from its cost per launch and payload (tolerance 0.2 percent, because the published $M costs are rounded). The paper's own text claims were recomputed from Table A1.
- Cost per kg to LEO = cost per launch divided by the maximum payload to LEO. The paper says it is the usual approach and that smaller payloads, payload accommodation and limited volume often raise the cost per kg. For commercial vehicles the cost is the advertised price, not the vehicle's cost to its maker, and development cost is not included.
- 2018. Paper A converts every cost from its reported year to 2018 dollars with the Consumer Price Index (Appendix A, page 8; page 3). Readings taken from the abstract of paper A and from paper B are shown as reported, without adjustment, and are labelled so.
36 launch systems from Table A1, 4 from Table A2, 2 from Table 1 and 10 readings. Unit: Thousands of 2018 US dollars per kilogram delivered to low Earth orbit ($k/kg), unless a row says ISS. Every derived figure on this page (changes, indexes, averages, counts) is computed from the published rows, and the table under each chart says how.
Checks
- Every figure is read from the page it is cited to; the script checks the expected table caption and the printed page number first.
- Table A2, Table 1, the abstract and paper B's Table 1 each recompute from their own cost and payload (within 0.2%, because the published $M costs are rounded). Table A1 and Table A2 agree on the four vehicles they share.
- Claims in the paper's text recompute from Table A1: 22 systems first flown 1970 to 2000 (paper: 22), their average 18.64 against the paper's 18.5, only the shuttle and Pegasus XL above $32k, a factor of about 23 (shuttle over Falcon 9 in Table A2), 4.2 to the ISS and about 170 (Vanguard over Saturn V).
- One text claim does not recompute: the paper says 7 of those systems cost under $10k per kg; Table A1 has 5 (Dnepr, Long March 2E, Long March 3B, Zenit 2, Zenit 3SL). The page uses Table A1.
Where the data comes from
This series is not in Live SQL. The data file behind every chart is data/analyses/space_cost_to_orbit.json, built by data/analyses/scripts/space_cost_to_orbit.py from the source downloads.
Caveats
- These are a 2018 snapshot compiled by one NASA engineer, not a NASA cost audit. Costs per launch for older vehicles come from other compilations (Koelle 1991, Wertz and Larson 1996, Futron 2002 and others; each row names its reference), and for the Falcons and Saturn V from SpaceX's advertised prices and a news article. Cost per kg divides by the maximum payload, so a launch that flies lighter costs more per kg. Commercial prices and government costs are different things. The paper's Table A1 caption says current dollars while its text and Table A2 say 2018 dollars; they are the same figures. No later vehicle (Starship, SLS) is covered, because no NASA table of cost per kg for them was found in the public-domain record, and prices have changed since 2018. The shuttle figure depends on which cost and which payload are used, which is why the page shows the range.
Releases and revisions
- Both papers are fixed documents (2017 and 2018); the NTRS record for ICES-2018-81 was distributed on Feb 25, 2020. This page does not change unless NASA publishes a newer table.
03Sources
Sources and licence.
- NASA NTRS 20200001093: The Recent Large Reduction in Space Launch Cost (ICES-2018-81) Tables A1 and A2 (page 8), Table 1 (page 3), abstract (page 1).
- ICES-2018-81 PDF Full text.
- NASA NTRS 20170010337: Much Lower Launch Costs Make Resupply Cheaper than Recycling (ICES-2017-87) Table 1 (page 2).
- ICES-2017-87 PDF Full text.
NASA Ames Research Center, H. W. Jones, via the NASA Technical Reports Server (ntrs.nasa.gov), documents 20200001093 and 20170010337. US government work by a NASA civil servant. The NTRS records state "GOV_PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED" and distribution PUBLIC. NASA asks that the source is credited and implies no endorsement. Public data.
Download the chart data
Each CSV is made in your browser from the rows in that chart's table.
04Contact
Want this kind of breakdown on your own data?
Open to e-commerce, data and operations roles. Los Angeles or remote.